https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339511 The tribunal found in favor of the appellants in the case regarding the classification of residual oil. It held that the certificate issued by the Chartered Engineer was not considered by the adjudicating authority, leading to the decision to remand the matter for re-examination. The tribunal also noted that certain issues, including the scope of the show cause notice and whether the residual oil was manufactured by the appellant, were not adequately examined. Consequently, the tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further consideration and examination of these issues. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:04:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339511 The tribunal found in favor of the appellants in the case regarding the classification of residual oil. It held that the certificate issued by the Chartered Engineer was not considered by the adjudicating authority, leading to the decision to remand the matter for re-examination. The tribunal also noted that certain issues, including the scope of the show cause notice and whether the residual oil was manufactured by the appellant, were not adequately examined. Consequently, the tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for further consideration and examination of these issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339511