https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339509 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order on both merits and limitation grounds. The judgment emphasized the significance of legal precedent, the relevance of DPCO prices, and the timing of High Court and Supreme Court decisions in determining the validity of the cenvat credit availed by the appellants. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:04:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339509 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order on both merits and limitation grounds. The judgment emphasized the significance of legal precedent, the relevance of DPCO prices, and the timing of High Court and Supreme Court decisions in determining the validity of the cenvat credit availed by the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339509