<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6928</link>
    <description>The court determined that the assessment of trustees under the Wealth-tax Act should be made under section 21(1) as the shares of the beneficiaries were deemed determinate and known on relevant valuation dates. Consequently, the assessment under section 21(4) was rejected. The court found the second issue regarding the calculation of asset values moot in light of the first determination. The Commissioner was directed to bear the costs of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6928</link>
      <description>The court determined that the assessment of trustees under the Wealth-tax Act should be made under section 21(1) as the shares of the beneficiaries were deemed determinate and known on relevant valuation dates. Consequently, the assessment under section 21(4) was rejected. The court found the second issue regarding the calculation of asset values moot in light of the first determination. The Commissioner was directed to bear the costs of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>