<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1367 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning eligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10) for a housing project. Despite the plot size reduction below 1 acre due to acquisition for D.P. Road and incomplete project within the specified time frame, the Tribunal allowed the deduction on a pro-rata basis for the completed part of the project. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:21:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1367 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning eligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10) for a housing project. Despite the plot size reduction below 1 acre due to acquisition for D.P. Road and incomplete project within the specified time frame, the Tribunal allowed the deduction on a pro-rata basis for the completed part of the project. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>