<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</link>
    <description>Section 12 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was held to allow only the allowances specifically provided under section 10(2), and the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) did not extend into that computation. The proviso was treated as a charging fiction for assessment under section 10, deeming certain excess sale proceeds to be profits, but not as a restriction on the allowance itself. Because section 12 contained no express provision adopting that fiction, it was not applied to income, profits and gains computed under section 12. The construction of the taxing provision was governed by its language alone, without importing intendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</link>
      <description>Section 12 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was held to allow only the allowances specifically provided under section 10(2), and the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) did not extend into that computation. The proviso was treated as a charging fiction for assessment under section 10, deeming certain excess sale proceeds to be profits, but not as a restriction on the allowance itself. Because section 12 contained no express provision adopting that fiction, it was not applied to income, profits and gains computed under section 12. The construction of the taxing provision was governed by its language alone, without importing intendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>