<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) does not apply in computing the income, profits, and gains of an assessee under section 12. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, entitling them to the costs of the reference, with counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 150.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii) does not apply in computing the income, profits, and gains of an assessee under section 12. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, entitling them to the costs of the reference, with counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 150.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>