<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>demanding consolidated tax amount under two sections</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111561</link>
    <description>Whether a consolidated tax amount can be confirmed under two distinct statutory provisions by tagging one provision &quot;read with&quot; another is disputed because the provisions require different methods of liability determination and recovery. The document records departmental justification for invoking both provisions to address collected-but-unpaid tax and limitation concerns, while practitioners recommend asserting pleas on separate quantification and limitation, noting divergent views on the viability of appeal and pragmatic litigation costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:20:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>demanding consolidated tax amount under two sections</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111561</link>
      <description>Whether a consolidated tax amount can be confirmed under two distinct statutory provisions by tagging one provision &quot;read with&quot; another is disputed because the provisions require different methods of liability determination and recovery. The document records departmental justification for invoking both provisions to address collected-but-unpaid tax and limitation concerns, while practitioners recommend asserting pleas on separate quantification and limitation, noting divergent views on the viability of appeal and pragmatic litigation costs.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:20:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>