<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT Rightly Revises AO&#039;s Decision for Section 10(38) Claim Due to Lack of STT Payment Verification on Share Sale.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33498</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO has allowed the claim of the assessee u/s 10(38) without examining whether the security transaction tax (STT) has been paid on the sale of the shares or not - the order of the Ld. CIT in assuming his jurisdiction under section 263 is correct - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT Rightly Revises AO&#039;s Decision for Section 10(38) Claim Due to Lack of STT Payment Verification on Share Sale.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33498</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO has allowed the claim of the assessee u/s 10(38) without examining whether the security transaction tax (STT) has been paid on the sale of the shares or not - the order of the Ld. CIT in assuming his jurisdiction under section 263 is correct - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>