<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339492</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the addition of certain amounts related to purchases made from specific suppliers were allowed by the ITAT. The ITAT found that the lower authorities did not conduct sufficient investigation beyond initial suspicions and relied on incomplete and unreliable evidence. As a result, the ITAT reversed the decisions of the lower authorities and allowed all the appeals filed by the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339492</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the addition of certain amounts related to purchases made from specific suppliers were allowed by the ITAT. The ITAT found that the lower authorities did not conduct sufficient investigation beyond initial suspicions and relied on incomplete and unreliable evidence. As a result, the ITAT reversed the decisions of the lower authorities and allowed all the appeals filed by the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>