<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by adjusting the profit ratio applied to the unrecorded transactions. The income addition was reduced to Rs. 4,44,066, and the rest of the addition was deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the assessee to reconcile transactions reported by the Bombay Stock Exchange and upheld the principle that Annual Information Report information cannot be simply brushed aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by adjusting the profit ratio applied to the unrecorded transactions. The income addition was reduced to Rs. 4,44,066, and the rest of the addition was deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the assessee to reconcile transactions reported by the Bombay Stock Exchange and upheld the principle that Annual Information Report information cannot be simply brushed aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>