<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1188 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339488</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions for disallowed electricity expenses and unexplained cash credits was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting the assessee provided satisfactory explanations and documents. The deletion of the disallowance of electricity expenses was upheld due to payments made by cheque and business requirements. For the unexplained cash credits, the CIT(A) found supporting documents for ONGC credits and detailed information for individual creditors. The Tribunal affirmed the findings, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s compliance with providing necessary details. The appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1188 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339488</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions for disallowed electricity expenses and unexplained cash credits was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting the assessee provided satisfactory explanations and documents. The deletion of the disallowance of electricity expenses was upheld due to payments made by cheque and business requirements. For the unexplained cash credits, the CIT(A) found supporting documents for ONGC credits and detailed information for individual creditors. The Tribunal affirmed the findings, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s compliance with providing necessary details. The appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>