<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1183 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the assessment of Short Term Capital Gains (STCGs) under section 111A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was set aside, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records for different types of share transactions. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly enquired and applied the concessional tax rate, deeming the assessment order as not erroneous. The decision highlighted the reasonableness of accepting the declared capital gains as STCGs, ultimately favoring the assessee and rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1183 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the assessment of Short Term Capital Gains (STCGs) under section 111A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was set aside, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records for different types of share transactions. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly enquired and applied the concessional tax rate, deeming the assessment order as not erroneous. The decision highlighted the reasonableness of accepting the declared capital gains as STCGs, ultimately favoring the assessee and rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>