<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1171 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339471</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the limitation period and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on certificates issued by CSIO or Aeronautic Development Agency. The Court emphasized the absence of fraud or intent to evade duty, ruling in favor of the respondent on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1171 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339471</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the limitation period and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on certificates issued by CSIO or Aeronautic Development Agency. The Court emphasized the absence of fraud or intent to evade duty, ruling in favor of the respondent on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>