<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the appellant under Rule 15 of CCR 2004, as there was no suppression or misstatement found. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the amount had already been paid and not disputed. The Tribunal concluded that since no specific sub-rule under Rule 15 was cited for confirming the penalty, it could not be sustained. Therefore, the penalty was overturned, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:42:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the appellant under Rule 15 of CCR 2004, as there was no suppression or misstatement found. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the amount had already been paid and not disputed. The Tribunal concluded that since no specific sub-rule under Rule 15 was cited for confirming the penalty, it could not be sustained. Therefore, the penalty was overturned, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>