https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339468 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the valuation method based on the cost of raw materials and job charges for manufacturing goods under a job work basis was appropriate. It rejected the Revenue's argument to treat the appellant as an agent of the principal manufacturers for excise duty valuation purposes. The decision was grounded in legal principles and precedents, setting aside the differential duty demand imposed on the appellant. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339468 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the valuation method based on the cost of raw materials and job charges for manufacturing goods under a job work basis was appropriate. It rejected the Revenue's argument to treat the appellant as an agent of the principal manufacturers for excise duty valuation purposes. The decision was grounded in legal principles and precedents, setting aside the differential duty demand imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339468