https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339466 The Tribunal upheld the respondent's valuation of goods cleared to the service division under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975. It was determined that the packaging differences between goods supplied to the service division and those sold in the market justified the dropping of demand. The Tribunal found no issues with the impugned order except for one specific item, partly allowing the Revenue's appeal. Ultimately, the impugned order was deemed sustainable, and the case was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339466 The Tribunal upheld the respondent's valuation of goods cleared to the service division under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975. It was determined that the packaging differences between goods supplied to the service division and those sold in the market justified the dropping of demand. The Tribunal found no issues with the impugned order except for one specific item, partly allowing the Revenue's appeal. Ultimately, the impugned order was deemed sustainable, and the case was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339466