<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339459</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty determinations may rely on verified exporter data for normal value, export price and dumping margin, rather than domestic producers&#039; cost assumptions where foreign manufacturing conditions differ. Confidentiality is permissible when non-confidential versions and meaningful general summaries are supplied while commercially sensitive costing information is protected under the prescribed framework. The determination was sustained because verification and disclosure procedures were followed. The statutory appellate remedy for anti-dumping duty is exclusive, so a cross appeal or cross objection cannot operate as a parallel appeal route under customs appellate provisions; the connected cross challenge was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339459</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty determinations may rely on verified exporter data for normal value, export price and dumping margin, rather than domestic producers&#039; cost assumptions where foreign manufacturing conditions differ. Confidentiality is permissible when non-confidential versions and meaningful general summaries are supplied while commercially sensitive costing information is protected under the prescribed framework. The determination was sustained because verification and disclosure procedures were followed. The statutory appellate remedy for anti-dumping duty is exclusive, so a cross appeal or cross objection cannot operate as a parallel appeal route under customs appellate provisions; the connected cross challenge was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>