<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190799</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed Revenue&#039;s. Additions under s.153A based solely on loose &quot;dumb&quot; documents alleging on-money receipts were deleted for lack of corroborative evidence or incriminating material. Consequential additions based on extrapolation of such alleged on-money were also struck down, the Tribunal holding that search assessments must rest on tangible evidence, not estimation. No income was held recognizable for AY 2008-09 under the project completion method, given the stage of construction and receipt of advances. Disallowance of compensation and interest earlier allowed in scrutiny was held invalid as a mere change of opinion without new material. Proportionate construction expenses and payments to the housing authority were held genuine business expenditure and fully allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190799</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed Revenue&#039;s. Additions under s.153A based solely on loose &quot;dumb&quot; documents alleging on-money receipts were deleted for lack of corroborative evidence or incriminating material. Consequential additions based on extrapolation of such alleged on-money were also struck down, the Tribunal holding that search assessments must rest on tangible evidence, not estimation. No income was held recognizable for AY 2008-09 under the project completion method, given the stage of construction and receipt of advances. Disallowance of compensation and interest earlier allowed in scrutiny was held invalid as a mere change of opinion without new material. Proportionate construction expenses and payments to the housing authority were held genuine business expenditure and fully allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>