https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190795 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the recovery of differential Central Excise duty for selling ATF at higher prices. The appellant successfully demonstrated that they did not collect excess Central Excise duty from customers, rendering the provisions of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act inapplicable. The Revenue's failure to provide evidence supporting the charges led to the dismissal of the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190795 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the recovery of differential Central Excise duty for selling ATF at higher prices. The appellant successfully demonstrated that they did not collect excess Central Excise duty from customers, rendering the provisions of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act inapplicable. The Revenue's failure to provide evidence supporting the charges led to the dismissal of the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190795