<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (6) TMI 2 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6917</link>
    <description>An assessment order refusing registration of an assessee-firm must be read as a whole and construed by substance rather than title. The order here expressly stated that assessment was completed under section 23(4) and that registration was refused in the exercise of discretion under that provision, even though it was also described by reference to section 26A and contained no recorded reasons. The absence of reasons did not negate exercise of discretion, and the powers under section 23(4) and section 26A were distinct and capable of operating together. On that construction, the refusal of registration was supportable under both provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (6) TMI 2 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6917</link>
      <description>An assessment order refusing registration of an assessee-firm must be read as a whole and construed by substance rather than title. The order here expressly stated that assessment was completed under section 23(4) and that registration was refused in the exercise of discretion under that provision, even though it was also described by reference to section 26A and contained no recorded reasons. The absence of reasons did not negate exercise of discretion, and the powers under section 23(4) and section 26A were distinct and capable of operating together. On that construction, the refusal of registration was supportable under both provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>