<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1095 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the determination of the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions and the selection of comparables for benchmarking. Certain comparables were excluded due to functional differences and mismatched financial data, resulting in adjustments to the additions made to the international transactions. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1095 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the determination of the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions and the selection of comparables for benchmarking. Certain comparables were excluded due to functional differences and mismatched financial data, resulting in adjustments to the additions made to the international transactions. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>