<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering the refund of the amount paid for reversing Cenvat Credit along with interest. The appellant was entitled to the refund claim, and the impugned order rejecting the claim was set aside. The appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential relief, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to the refund based on the legal interpretation provided by the High Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering the refund of the amount paid for reversing Cenvat Credit along with interest. The appellant was entitled to the refund claim, and the impugned order rejecting the claim was set aside. The appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential relief, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to the refund based on the legal interpretation provided by the High Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>