<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1139 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339439</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the confirmation of the demand regarding shortages but the setting aside of the penalty on the appellant. The appellant&#039;s argument of no mala fide intention for not recording shortages in statutory records was accepted, considering the history of informing the department about process losses and the absence of intent to evade payment. The Tribunal acknowledged the shortages and process losses within permissible limits, leading to the decision to uphold the demand while overturning the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:57:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1139 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339439</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the confirmation of the demand regarding shortages but the setting aside of the penalty on the appellant. The appellant&#039;s argument of no mala fide intention for not recording shortages in statutory records was accepted, considering the history of informing the department about process losses and the absence of intent to evade payment. The Tribunal acknowledged the shortages and process losses within permissible limits, leading to the decision to uphold the demand while overturning the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>