<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339438</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration after the Tribunal affirmed the dropping of charges of clandestine removal of goods against the respondents. The Tribunal found the charge unsustainable due to doubts regarding the physical verification process and non-compliance with prescribed procedures in relying on computer prints as evidence. As a result, the impugned order was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339438</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration after the Tribunal affirmed the dropping of charges of clandestine removal of goods against the respondents. The Tribunal found the charge unsustainable due to doubts regarding the physical verification process and non-compliance with prescribed procedures in relying on computer prints as evidence. As a result, the impugned order was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>