<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1136 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to verify if the appellant had a sufficient balance in their cenvat credit account during the relevant period. If proven, the demand for interest would not be sustainable. No penalty was deemed applicable, and the appeal was disposed of by remand for further verification and appropriate order issuance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1136 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to verify if the appellant had a sufficient balance in their cenvat credit account during the relevant period. If proven, the demand for interest would not be sustainable. No penalty was deemed applicable, and the appeal was disposed of by remand for further verification and appropriate order issuance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>