<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1134 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving excess customs duty payment and refund claims for imported telecommunication equipment. The rejection of the refund on unjust enrichment grounds was deemed unjustified based on legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, directing the refund to be paid in cash to the appellant after deducting the CVD component, in accordance with the settled law by the Karnataka High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 21:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1134 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving excess customs duty payment and refund claims for imported telecommunication equipment. The rejection of the refund on unjust enrichment grounds was deemed unjustified based on legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, directing the refund to be paid in cash to the appellant after deducting the CVD component, in accordance with the settled law by the Karnataka High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>