<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1129 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions, including unexplained cash credits, interest expenses, and compliance with TDS requirements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:56:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1129 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions, including unexplained cash credits, interest expenses, and compliance with TDS requirements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>