<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1127 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339427</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act must specify the grounds for penalty initiation. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice. The Court found the penalty order unsustainable due to the lack of specificity in the notice, setting aside the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1127 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339427</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act must specify the grounds for penalty initiation. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice. The Court found the penalty order unsustainable due to the lack of specificity in the notice, setting aside the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>