<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1088 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the lack of corroborative material and reliance on estimated income. The Tribunal emphasized the insufficiency of penalties based solely on income estimations and the importance of adhering to judicial directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1088 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the lack of corroborative material and reliance on estimated income. The Tribunal emphasized the insufficiency of penalties based solely on income estimations and the importance of adhering to judicial directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>