<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1084 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to assess the income at a profit rate of 10% due to the rejection of books of accounts by the assessee. The judgment stressed the significance of proving transactions and the effect on profit estimation in cases of disputed purchases, underlining the importance of precise financial records and adherence to tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1084 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to assess the income at a profit rate of 10% due to the rejection of books of accounts by the assessee. The judgment stressed the significance of proving transactions and the effect on profit estimation in cases of disputed purchases, underlining the importance of precise financial records and adherence to tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>