<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1083 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339383</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2009-10, remitting the trading addition issue back to the AO for a fair reassessment. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper comparisons with similar traders and previous years&#039; results, directing the AO to consider a trader with a lower G.P. rate. The decision highlighted the need for a thorough examination of trading results and G.P. rates to ensure fairness in assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1083 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339383</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2009-10, remitting the trading addition issue back to the AO for a fair reassessment. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper comparisons with similar traders and previous years&#039; results, directing the AO to consider a trader with a lower G.P. rate. The decision highlighted the need for a thorough examination of trading results and G.P. rates to ensure fairness in assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>