<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1059 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that notional interest on advances given by M/s. Mahindra Ford India Ltd. to the appellant should not be included in the assessable value of vehicles manufactured by the respondent. It was determined that the duty was discharged based on the sale price of M/s. Mahindra Ford India Ltd., which already included all costs and profits, making the addition of notional interest unnecessary. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the respondent and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1059 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that notional interest on advances given by M/s. Mahindra Ford India Ltd. to the appellant should not be included in the assessable value of vehicles manufactured by the respondent. It was determined that the duty was discharged based on the sale price of M/s. Mahindra Ford India Ltd., which already included all costs and profits, making the addition of notional interest unnecessary. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the respondent and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>