<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1055 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Restoration of Appeal (ROA) and Rectification of Mistake (ROM) applications by the appellant, M/s Fairdeal Supplies Pvt Ltd. The appellant&#039;s continuous absence during proceedings and alleged errors in the original judgment were not deemed sufficient reasons for interference with the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision. The Tribunal, consisting of D. M. Misra, Member (Judicial), and Mr. Ashok K Arya, Member (Technical), held that once a matter is decided on merits, the Tribunal cannot entertain further applications for restoration or rectification unless there are clear and obvious mistakes. Both applications were dismissed on 25/01/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:10:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1055 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Restoration of Appeal (ROA) and Rectification of Mistake (ROM) applications by the appellant, M/s Fairdeal Supplies Pvt Ltd. The appellant&#039;s continuous absence during proceedings and alleged errors in the original judgment were not deemed sufficient reasons for interference with the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision. The Tribunal, consisting of D. M. Misra, Member (Judicial), and Mr. Ashok K Arya, Member (Technical), held that once a matter is decided on merits, the Tribunal cannot entertain further applications for restoration or rectification unless there are clear and obvious mistakes. Both applications were dismissed on 25/01/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>