<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339353</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging orders concerning Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2012-13. The dispute centered on whether a &quot;Terminalling Service Agreement&quot; constituted a works contract or a BOOT contract. The court found that the agreement fell under the definition of a works contract. Regarding payments to a sub-contractor, the court directed the petitioner to seek resolution through the appellate authority, criticizing the direct approach to the court. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory procedures and dismissed the writ petitions while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through proper channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339353</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging orders concerning Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2012-13. The dispute centered on whether a &quot;Terminalling Service Agreement&quot; constituted a works contract or a BOOT contract. The court found that the agreement fell under the definition of a works contract. Regarding payments to a sub-contractor, the court directed the petitioner to seek resolution through the appellate authority, criticizing the direct approach to the court. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory procedures and dismissed the writ petitions while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through proper channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>