https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339350 The Petitioner Company successfully sought restoration of its name in the Register of Companies under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The company's name had been struck off in 2008 due to non-filing of statutory documents since 1995. Despite operational challenges and lack of prior notices, the company demonstrated its intent for revival by submitting required documents and complying with statutory obligations. The Court, following legal precedents and the purpose of the relevant provision, ordered the restoration of the company's name, subject to fulfilling all necessary requirements within the specified timeline. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:30:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339350 The Petitioner Company successfully sought restoration of its name in the Register of Companies under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The company's name had been struck off in 2008 due to non-filing of statutory documents since 1995. Despite operational challenges and lack of prior notices, the company demonstrated its intent for revival by submitting required documents and complying with statutory obligations. The Court, following legal precedents and the purpose of the relevant provision, ordered the restoration of the company's name, subject to fulfilling all necessary requirements within the specified timeline. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339350