<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1366 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application, stating it lacked merit and was not maintainable. The appellant&#039;s failure to file a written reply and new contentions raised post-final order were deemed insufficient grounds to recall the final order. The procedural error of not recording consent did not invalidate the final decision, as no objections were raised during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1366 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application, stating it lacked merit and was not maintainable. The appellant&#039;s failure to file a written reply and new contentions raised post-final order were deemed insufficient grounds to recall the final order. The procedural error of not recording consent did not invalidate the final decision, as no objections were raised during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>