<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1048 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, while upholding the penalty under Section 77. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the judgment pronounced on 31-1-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:16:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1048 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, while upholding the penalty under Section 77. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the judgment pronounced on 31-1-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>