<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Department Challenges Captive Consumption Benefit Under Notification 67/95-CE; Duty Payable Upon Invoice, Not Removal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33428</link>
    <description>Benefit of N/N. 67/95-CE dt. 16.03.1995 - captive consumption - Department&#039;s claim that once invoice is raised to the customer, they were supposed to pay duty even if the goods were not removed from the factory - Since the goods have been sold by the appellants, the N/N. 67/95-CE, is not applicable. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Department Challenges Captive Consumption Benefit Under Notification 67/95-CE; Duty Payable Upon Invoice, Not Removal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33428</link>
      <description>Benefit of N/N. 67/95-CE dt. 16.03.1995 - captive consumption - Department&#039;s claim that once invoice is raised to the customer, they were supposed to pay duty even if the goods were not removed from the factory - Since the goods have been sold by the appellants, the N/N. 67/95-CE, is not applicable. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>