<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1035 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to a Larger Bench to determine whether the appellant is entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE for supplying weighing machines and conveyors for a Bio Gas Combustion Co-Generation Power Project. This decision was made due to conflicting tribunal decisions and the need for clarification on the interpretation of the specific notification in relation to the nature of the devices and their role in energy production from waste.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1035 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to a Larger Bench to determine whether the appellant is entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE for supplying weighing machines and conveyors for a Bio Gas Combustion Co-Generation Power Project. This decision was made due to conflicting tribunal decisions and the need for clarification on the interpretation of the specific notification in relation to the nature of the devices and their role in energy production from waste.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>