<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1033 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of interest and penalty due to the absence of malafide intention and the reversal of the credit availed on capital goods. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to the provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules and relevant notifications to avoid wrongful availment of credits and subsequent liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1033 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of interest and penalty due to the absence of malafide intention and the reversal of the credit availed on capital goods. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to the provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules and relevant notifications to avoid wrongful availment of credits and subsequent liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>