<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1032 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the branding classification of tractor parts supplied to OEMs. The judgment emphasized the applicability of a newer Board Circular superseding an earlier one, following a Supreme Court precedent. It concluded that the tractor parts, labeled with stickers, did not qualify as branded goods for exemption under the relevant notifications. The decision provided clarity on the distinction between branded and non-branded products for exemption purposes, referencing specific legal frameworks and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1032 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the branding classification of tractor parts supplied to OEMs. The judgment emphasized the applicability of a newer Board Circular superseding an earlier one, following a Supreme Court precedent. It concluded that the tractor parts, labeled with stickers, did not qualify as branded goods for exemption under the relevant notifications. The decision provided clarity on the distinction between branded and non-branded products for exemption purposes, referencing specific legal frameworks and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>