<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty based on production capacity not alleged in the show cause notice, citing precedents that orders cannot exceed notice scope. Duty demanded under rules not in force during the relevant period was also invalidated. Documents from a biased third party lacked credibility and corroboration, leading to the conclusion that duty could not be demanded based on them alone. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision with emphasis on thorough evidence scrutiny and appellant&#039;s right to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty based on production capacity not alleged in the show cause notice, citing precedents that orders cannot exceed notice scope. Duty demanded under rules not in force during the relevant period was also invalidated. Documents from a biased third party lacked credibility and corroboration, leading to the conclusion that duty could not be demanded based on them alone. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision with emphasis on thorough evidence scrutiny and appellant&#039;s right to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>