<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 663 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the sale of property as a long-term capital loss rather than a short-term capital gain. The dispute centered on the acquisition date of the capital asset, with the Tribunal determining that the Assessee acquired the right in 1994, leading to the classification of the loss as long-term. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in December 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 663 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the sale of property as a long-term capital loss rather than a short-term capital gain. The dispute centered on the acquisition date of the capital asset, with the Tribunal determining that the Assessee acquired the right in 1994, leading to the classification of the loss as long-term. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in December 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>