<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 962 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190744</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned and the civil appeal was dismissed, with no substantive reasoning recorded in the order. The document therefore reflects only the procedural outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings in a central excise matter, without any stated determination on the underlying legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 962 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190744</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned and the civil appeal was dismissed, with no substantive reasoning recorded in the order. The document therefore reflects only the procedural outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings in a central excise matter, without any stated determination on the underlying legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>