<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1024 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the valuation of imported goods as determined by lower authorities. The appellant&#039;s failure to object or provide valid grounds for appeal led to the dismissal of the appeal. The original assessment was deemed legal and correct, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1024 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the valuation of imported goods as determined by lower authorities. The appellant&#039;s failure to object or provide valid grounds for appeal led to the dismissal of the appeal. The original assessment was deemed legal and correct, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>