<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1449 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190740</link>
    <description>Leasing of an entire factory, together with plant, machinery and other assets, by a manufacturing unit was not treated as taxable banking and other financial services where the arrangement was a fixed-term rental lease, with no transfer of ownership, no right for the lessee to acquire the assets, and no other features of financial leasing. The Tribunal noted that the service entry covers financial leasing, equipment leasing and hire-purchase, but mere leasing of factory premises and machinery by a non-lease-finance business does not satisfy those attributes. On that basis, the tax demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1449 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190740</link>
      <description>Leasing of an entire factory, together with plant, machinery and other assets, by a manufacturing unit was not treated as taxable banking and other financial services where the arrangement was a fixed-term rental lease, with no transfer of ownership, no right for the lessee to acquire the assets, and no other features of financial leasing. The Tribunal noted that the service entry covers financial leasing, equipment leasing and hire-purchase, but mere leasing of factory premises and machinery by a non-lease-finance business does not satisfy those attributes. On that basis, the tax demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>