<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1014 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339314</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance under Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as no exempt income was earned. Regarding the disallowance of sundry balances written off, the tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for further examination to verify the claims made by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1014 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339314</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance under Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as no exempt income was earned. Regarding the disallowance of sundry balances written off, the tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for further examination to verify the claims made by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>