https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190731 The Tribunal denied the applicant the benefit of waiver under Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. for Service Tax, as the services provided did not fall within the scope of the notification. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed demand within eight weeks, with the remaining amount waived upon such deposit. Liability for other demands related to shifting electric cables and GTA service abatement was upheld, requiring payment of the corresponding Service Tax amounts. Recovery was stayed during the appeal process. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:45:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190731 The Tribunal denied the applicant the benefit of waiver under Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. for Service Tax, as the services provided did not fall within the scope of the notification. The applicant was directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed demand within eight weeks, with the remaining amount waived upon such deposit. Liability for other demands related to shifting electric cables and GTA service abatement was upheld, requiring payment of the corresponding Service Tax amounts. Recovery was stayed during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190731