<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 989 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee. It upheld the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the denial of exemption under Section 54F due to the demolition of the residential property and confirmed the addition of Rs. 7,34,750 as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The order was pronounced on November 30, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 989 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee. It upheld the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the denial of exemption under Section 54F due to the demolition of the residential property and confirmed the addition of Rs. 7,34,750 as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The order was pronounced on November 30, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>