<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the decision that the payment of royalty for technical know-how is not taxable under &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Services.&quot; The Tribunal found that the service received by the appellant does not fall within this category, citing precedents from other cases. The appeal by M/s. Supreme Industries Ltd. was allowed based on this determination, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected as the matter remains pending before the High Court of Bombay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the decision that the payment of royalty for technical know-how is not taxable under &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Services.&quot; The Tribunal found that the service received by the appellant does not fall within this category, citing precedents from other cases. The appeal by M/s. Supreme Industries Ltd. was allowed based on this determination, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected as the matter remains pending before the High Court of Bombay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>