<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 14 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6881</link>
    <description>A Mohammedan family governed by Marumakkathayam law can fall within the statutory expression &quot;Hindu undivided family&quot; under the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, because section 2(kk) expressly includes an undivided Marumakkathayam tarwad or thavazhi within that definition. The definition is not confined by religious faith, and section 2(m) treats a Hindu undivided family as a &quot;person&quot; for agricultural income-tax purposes. Read consistently with the Constitution, the provision supports the Act&#039;s validity. On that basis, the family is entitled to the benefit of section 3(3), and assessment of the entire family income was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 14 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6881</link>
      <description>A Mohammedan family governed by Marumakkathayam law can fall within the statutory expression &quot;Hindu undivided family&quot; under the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, because section 2(kk) expressly includes an undivided Marumakkathayam tarwad or thavazhi within that definition. The definition is not confined by religious faith, and section 2(m) treats a Hindu undivided family as a &quot;person&quot; for agricultural income-tax purposes. Read consistently with the Constitution, the provision supports the Act&#039;s validity. On that basis, the family is entitled to the benefit of section 3(3), and assessment of the entire family income was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>